- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:58:06 +0100
- To: "Brad Kemper" <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "www-style list" <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:49:37 +0100, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 23, 2010, at 7:43 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> I have not checked, but is it true that because of this interpolation >> CSS gradients are going to work different from <canvas>/SVG gradients? >> And if so, is that really a good thing? > > I think it was always the idea to have CSS gradients as a much simpler > alternative to SVG gradient syntax, so that if you really needed the > extra power you could use SVG. I do think that is a very good thing. Sorry, I meant whether colors are premultiplied or not. (For some reason I thought it was about interpolation.) It's not a syntax issue, but a model issue. And I would very much like the model to be shared with SVG/<canvas> so we do not need multiple codepaths. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 23 November 2010 15:58:42 UTC