Re: a new proposal for grid layout, derived from MSFT's from Brad Kemper on 2010-11-17 (www-style@w3.org from November 2010)

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:38:43 -0800
To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Cc: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Markus Mielke <mmielke@microsoft.com>
Message-Id: <55AC81CA-692B-48E7-88F8-4F00ACEDC8F6@gmail.com>

On Nov 17, 2010, at 9:42 AM, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote:

> I don't really like the idea
> of spanning in a grid layout. A grid should define
> position of blocks and spanning is really a concept
> that belongs to tables and should not be there.

I disagree with this comment about spanning. Having a container that spans rows or columns is incredibly important for layout.

Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2010 20:39:54 UTC