- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:52:07 -0800
- To: Lee Kowalkowski <lee.kowalkowski@googlemail.com>
- Cc: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, Markus Ernst <derernst@gmx.ch>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Lee Kowalkowski <lee.kowalkowski@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 10 November 2010 23:23, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Nov 10, 2010, at 8:35 AM, "Markus Ernst" <derernst@gmx.ch> wrote: >>> I do not know whether there are explicit use cases for this, but the >>> background-position property as a shorthand is not really intuitive; I >>> myself have to check a manual every time I need this property, because I >>> always forget the order of the values. So, for some authors, separate >>> properties would make a little thing a little bit easier. >> >> I'm more sympathetic to this line of thought, as I also have to pause to >> think which dimension comes first (it's the opposite of when you specify two >> length for, say, margin). However, I think this has already improved a lot >> in the latest spec, because now you can be very explicit about the edge to >> measure from. For instance: >> >> background-position: left 10px top 15px; > > But unless I misread the specification, you still have to remember the > order to do this. I mean, is "top 15px left 10px" allowed? Yes. That's the whole reason for tagging it with a side keyword - there's no need for a specific order, because it's unambiguous. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2010 23:53:00 UTC