- From: Lee Kowalkowski <lee.kowalkowski@googlemail.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 23:51:15 +0000
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Cc: Markus Ernst <derernst@gmx.ch>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 10 November 2010 23:23, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 10, 2010, at 8:35 AM, "Markus Ernst" <derernst@gmx.ch> wrote: >> I do not know whether there are explicit use cases for this, but the >> background-position property as a shorthand is not really intuitive; I >> myself have to check a manual every time I need this property, because I >> always forget the order of the values. So, for some authors, separate >> properties would make a little thing a little bit easier. > > I'm more sympathetic to this line of thought, as I also have to pause to > think which dimension comes first (it's the opposite of when you specify two > length for, say, margin). However, I think this has already improved a lot > in the latest spec, because now you can be very explicit about the edge to > measure from. For instance: > > background-position: left 10px top 15px; But unless I misread the specification, you still have to remember the order to do this. I mean, is "top 15px left 10px" allowed? If the order was consistent with the top, right, bottom, left sequence used for margin & padding shorthand, it might be easier to commit to memory. -- Lee www.webdeavour.co.uk
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2010 23:51:48 UTC