- From: Lee Kowalkowski <lee.kowalkowski@googlemail.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:02:42 +0000
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 09/11/2010, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > Right, besides that, it also means that you cannot have a flexibly sized box > with a background-color that extends out beyond the edge of the image in a > single element. Huh? Sure you can. Just don't use a sprite image. > you mostly can't use background-position in its "normal" way > without revealing some part of an unrelated image No! Don't use sprite images and you'll be fine. This doesn't sound like opposition of -x/-y or -left/-top/-right/-bottom. I'm not asking to redefine background-position, you can still use background-position in normal ways! -- Lee www.webdeavour.co.uk
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 11:03:19 UTC