- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 17:42:31 -0700
- To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com> wrote: > While we are discussing Flexbox in general, I’d like to resolve some very > specific issues. These are issues to be specified regardless of other > potential changes in the module. > > > > · In reverse direction, what should “pack:start” do? I think pack:start should pack towards whichever side the children start in, and so box-direction:reverse would swap the "start" direction. > · How does max-height on items affect alignment and box height? max-height *should* be honored, and have no special effect on any other child or the flexbox as a whole. Unfortunately box-align isn't clear on exactly what length it increases to do its align:stretch. If it's increasing height directly, then max-height should take effect, and we need to clarify how things are aligned when they can't be fully stretched. If it's increasing padding-bottom, then max-height won't have any effect (unless you change box-sizing, and then we're in the previous situation). If it's doing something more magical, then there's no way to tell - we just need to decide by fiat what the correct behavior is. > In Mozilla max-height on any items appears to affect all > items. That looks like a bug to me. Agreed. > · Where is the baseline of an inline-box? > > Again, implementations differ. I am not sure I have a preference. Where > should it be? What's the baseline of an inline-table? I suspect inline-box should act similarly. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 27 May 2010 00:43:23 UTC