RE: Fw: RE: [css-flexbox] Summary of planned changes to Flexbox Module

I think that would be the right thing to do. I am not even sure what it could mean for it to not be BFC.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 3:17 PM
To: Alex Mogilevsky
Cc: Andrew Fedoniouk; robert@ocallahan.org; Adam Del Vecchio; www-style@w3.org
Subject: Re: Fw: RE: [css-flexbox] Summary of planned changes to Flexbox Module

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 2:52 PM
>>
>> If this is a problem, you just make the flexbox a BFC, so it won't overlap the float.
>
> Are you suggesting Flexbox currently is not BFC?

The current Flexbox draft says nothing about it, so I was going with the assumption that it wasn't.  I can change that assumption if it doesn't make sense for it to not be a BFC.

~TJ

Received on Monday, 17 May 2010 22:57:00 UTC