- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 18:37:45 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>, Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>, "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, Adam Del Vecchio <adam.delvecchio@go-techo.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Monday 2010-05-17 15:17 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com> wrote: > >> From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 2:52 PM > >> > >> If this is a problem, you just make the flexbox a BFC, so it won't overlap the float. > > > > Are you suggesting Flexbox currently is not BFC? > > The current Flexbox draft says nothing about it, so I was going with > the assumption that it wasn't. I can change that assumption if it > doesn't make sense for it to not be a BFC. I think flexboxes should establish new block formatting contexts (as table cells do). It doesn't make sense for floats inside them to try to move outside of them. -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Tuesday, 18 May 2010 01:38:24 UTC