Re: [css3-content] "content" property, replaced elements, and width

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Daniel Glazman
<daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote:
> Le 10/05/10 18:03, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit :
>
>> <img>  is a null element in HTML, and *can't* have children in the markup.
>>  ^_^
>
> I never said I find it clever to preserve the emptyness of <img> and the
> old HTML 2.0 model of the element.
>
> Tab, I honestly don't care if 'content' works as said in CSS3... We can
> have our own non-empty image tag anyway with a fallback mechanism for
> images that is simpler than <object>.

So, I'm not quite sure what you're aiming at at this point, then.  Do
you have something to say on the thread?  Would you mind refocusing if
you do?

~TJ

Received on Monday, 10 May 2010 17:30:05 UTC