- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 18:56:02 +0200
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Le 10/05/10 18:03, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit : > <img> is a null element in HTML, and *can't* have children in the markup. ^_^ I never said I find it clever to preserve the emptyness of <img> and the old HTML 2.0 model of the element. Tab, I honestly don't care if 'content' works as said in CSS3... We can have our own non-empty image tag anyway with a fallback mechanism for images that is simpler than <object>. </Daniel>
Received on Monday, 10 May 2010 16:56:37 UTC