- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:22:49 -0700
- To: robert@ocallahan.org
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 06/29/2010 09:18 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 10:12 AM, fantasai > <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net <mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>> > wrote: > > - Defining mm, cm, and in relative to px has rather unexpected > effects on Media Queries: I can no longer query the physical > dimensions of my screen or viewport, only its pixel grid size. > > What are the use cases for querying the physical dimensions of the > screen or viewport? > > I suspect those use cases are very limited, just like the use cases for > true physical units are very limited. I imagine querying the physical viewport size of a handheld would be useful. Given the wide variation in screen resolutions on handhelds, knowing its pixel grid size is somewhat less useful. > This addresses the use cases for real physical units, addresses the > web-compat problem with authors mixing points and pixels, and avoids > redefining the millimetre. Given that roc suspects it won't break > the Web, I'd rather go this route. > > Actually, I'm not sure. We do have a number of tests that break if you > make 1pt != 1in/72. Tests that you wrote, in fact :-). But I'm not sure > that you're a representative Web developer :-). Hah, yeah, I don't count. :) ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 30 June 2010 06:23:24 UTC