W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2010

Re: [css3-background] vastly different takes on "blur"

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:43:31 -0700
Message-Id: <3154E469-4A05-4488-A218-A06A104F800A@gmail.com>
Cc: Brendan Kenny <bckenny@gmail.com>, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>

On Jun 25, 2010, at 10:21 AM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:

> It appears that text-shadow is either "outward expanse of blur = blur
> length" (webkit, seemingly for both large and small values of blur) or
> "outward expanse of blur = roughly blur length * 1.6" (Firefox).  I
> haven't checked Opera yet.

Could you post a test case and screen capture of that? I wasn't able to replicate that difference on my Mac using Simon's test (I think it was Simon... it's not in front of me right now). 
Received on Friday, 25 June 2010 17:44:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:47 UTC