- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:19:47 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Brendan Kenny <bckenny@gmail.com>, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Jun 23, 2010, at 11:25 AM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > By the way, I've posed a text-based survey on Facebook, and gotten a > few fairly consistent answers. > > The question is: > """ > Quick survey for you web-designy people: The syntax for box-shadow is > x-offset, then y-offset, then blur. Now, if you see "box-shadow: 0px > 0px 10px gray;", how far out from the box do you expect the blurred > shadow to extend? 5px? 10px? 20px? A different number dictated by some > gaussian function? > """ That seems to be using a much less common example (zero offsets) in order to hide half the blur and thus bias the answer towards something that does not consider it.
Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2010 19:20:35 UTC