- From: Brendan Kenny <bckenny@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:14:14 -0500
- To: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com> wrote: > Request: Please incorporate the “mathematical vs. human perception” in your > renderings. For me at least, it really helps make evaluation less ... um > ... blurry. > > > > Thanks, > > -Brian > > > > From: Brad Kemper [mailto:brad.kemper@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 10:11 AM > To: Sylvain Galineau > Cc: Brian Manthos; fantasai; Simon Fraser; Tab Atkins Jr.; > robert@ocallahan.org; www-style@w3.org > Subject: Re: [css3-background] vastly different takes on "blur" > > > > OK. I'm pretty booked today during (US West Coast) daytime, but will try to > have something tonight or tomorrow to present that is heavily slanted toward > my viewpoint. Uh, I mean, something fair and acceptable for voting on, > including some zoomed-in bitmaps and where they fall on the edge, etc., to > evaluate. > > > > > > On Jun 23, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > > Same. We can’t really agree on the definition of a visual effects without > understanding and agreement of what it should look like (see spread vs. > scaling discussion). > > And it sounds like current implementations may not allow us to figure it > out. > > > > Unlike Brad though, I am somewhat sensitive to what SVG, canvas et al. do. > It would not be helpful to authors mixing HTML and SVG to have to juggle > multiply/divide > > by 2 depending on the node type just so they get the same rendering. At > least we should have a good reason for the difference. > > > > From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On Behalf > Of Brian Manthos > Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 4:17 PM > To: Brad Kemper; fantasai > Cc: Simon Fraser; Tab Atkins Jr.; robert@ocallahan.org; www-style@w3.org > Subject: RE: [css3-background] vastly different takes on "blur" > > > > +1 vote for Brad Blur Ballot Bitmaps > > > > * Brian Just to be clear, aren't the mockups for each option going to be the same thing? For instance, wouldn't Simon's example http://smfr.org/misc/shadow.html just be accompanied by the question "Would you describe this as 'blur: 8px' or 'blur: 16px'?" ?
Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2010 18:14:49 UTC