W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2010

Re: [css3-background] vastly different takes on "blur"

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:10:53 -0700
Cc: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-Id: <D96DF4A6-CA4F-45BD-94C7-388E721D77F6@gmail.com>
To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
OK. I'm pretty booked today during (US West Coast) daytime, but will try to have something tonight or tomorrow to present that is heavily slanted toward my viewpoint. Uh, I mean, something fair and acceptable for voting on, including some zoomed-in bitmaps and where they fall on the edge, etc., to evaluate.

On Jun 23, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Sylvain Galineau wrote:

> Same. We canít really agree on the definition of a visual effects without understanding and agreement of what it should look like (see spread vs. scaling discussion).
> And it sounds like current implementations may not allow us to figure it out.
> Unlike Brad though, I am somewhat sensitive to what SVG, canvas et al. do. It would not be helpful to authors mixing HTML and SVG to have to juggle multiply/divide
> by 2 depending on the node type just so they get the same rendering. At least we should have a good reason for the difference.
> From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Brian Manthos
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 4:17 PM
> To: Brad Kemper; fantasai
> Cc: Simon Fraser; Tab Atkins Jr.; robert@ocallahan.org; www-style@w3.org
> Subject: RE: [css3-background] vastly different takes on "blur"
> +1 vote for Brad Blur Ballot Bitmaps
> * Brian

Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2010 17:11:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:47 UTC