- From: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 17:34:51 +0000
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, Brendan Kenny <bckenny@gmail.com>, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Brad Kemper: > And as I've said in the past, spread is not something created in order > to simulate some phenomenon observed in nature. It is intended to give > greater control of the placement and extent of the shadow at a level > consistent with what is commonly available when creating shadows in > familiar ways using tools such Photoshop. Is this the only place in CSS3 that gives authors a way to apply such an shape-derivation effect? I think "yes", and the answer is important for the overall decision at hand from the perspective of "give them markup syntax so they don't have to do bitmaps". -Brian
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2010 17:40:58 UTC