Also sprach MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given): > To me, some of the proposals from important members of the > CSS WG is based on poor understanding of the requirements. > I have already explained why :lang does not work > in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010May/0668.html where you wrote: > > To me, it seems that both the proposed alternatives fulfill this > > requirement. In Alt 1, which relies on language codes, one can write: > > :lang(ja) { ... } > :lang(en) { ... } > > This certainly fails because different Japanese paragarphs within > a single document have different writing directions. It's trivial to extend the example to take this into account. E.g.: :lang(ja) { writing-mode: tb-rl } :lang(ja) table { writing-mode: lr-tb } :lang(en) { writing-mode: lr-tb } This would allow you to express your preferences for writing directions, if not provide graceful degradation in all cases. > To be clear, I have never made broad assertions against those who > criticize the margin-start, etc. proposal. I did make such > assertions against those who raise counter proposals based on poor > understanding of the requirement or the dir attribute. I think you're underestimating your peers in this forum. > > Other than graceful fallback are there other reasons you feel logical > > properties are required? > > This is the biggest reason. That's good to know. > > A lot of folks at browser companies are spending time and effort to > > make typography better on the web. If a proposed change requires a lot > > of work and doesn't really solve underlying problems completely, why not > > consider a different approach that does a better job? > > A different approach is fine, but :lang is broken and :ttb is extremely > doubtful. I think you're disregarding other proposals too quickly, with too strong words, before the proposals have been developed. All proposals needs discussion and development, that's what this list is for. Cheers, -h&kon Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcomeReceived on Friday, 4 June 2010 10:02:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:47 UTC