- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 09:14:22 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Jun 2, 2010, at 7:53 PM, fantasai wrote: > On 05/26/2010 08:06 PM, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: >> Referring to http://www.xanthir.com/:wih document. >> >> I don't think that 'fl' is particularly good name for flex units. >> One of the reasons is that character 'l' is very close to either 'I' or >> '1' in most of fonts in use for development. >> >> I think that something like 1fx is better. > > The WG at one point also considered 'fr' for this use case. > I think that may have found its way into some drafts already. > I'm happy with any of the three. What does the "r" stand for? I agree with Andrew that "fl" is hard to read. To my rapidly aging eyes it just looks like two fence posts, unless I reach for the reading glasses. How about "fu" for "flex units"? It has the added benefit of being kind of funny.
Received on Thursday, 3 June 2010 16:14:58 UTC