- From: Peter Moulder <peter.moulder@monash.edu>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 17:27:51 +1000
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 09:41:14PM -0700, L. David Baron wrote: > Change the third paragraph from: ... > into: > # ... The table cell's 'height' property can > # influence the height of the row, I'd suggest adding "(see above)" here: i.e. as a reader, I'd want to know how it can influence the height of the row; the words "(see above)" are intended to convey that the only influence it has is via the provision to be made in the second paragraph. > In the second paragraph, change: > # it is the maximum of the row's specified 'height' and the > # minimum height (MIN) required by the cells > to say: > # it is the maximum of the row's specified 'height', the specified > # 'height' of each cell in the row, and the minimum height (MIN) > # required by the cells Why the word "specified" here? That suggests that it's the specified value, whereas presumably we want the computed value. What effect, if any, should 'min-height' or 'max-height' have on table cells or rows? I'd recommend changing visudet.html's definitions of 'height', 'min-height' and 'max-height' too. After all, these purport to define the meaning of these properties. (Granted, each of these issues exists whether or not the above proposal is accepted.) pjrm.
Received on Wednesday, 2 June 2010 07:28:22 UTC