- From: Andrés Sanhueza <peroyomaslists@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 22:03:42 -0400
- To: Eduard Pascual <herenvardo@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style@w3.org
2010/7/12 Eduard Pascual <herenvardo@gmail.com>: > On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > In any case, now I am even more convinced that a request for a CSS > feature to work-around the mark-up's inability to describe a structure > is quite a symptom of a flaw on the mark-up language. In other words, > the use cases should be addressed by HTML through explicit structuring > elements. I agree, but there are cases where it is justified, like if I want to group several <li> in a list for showing something like a table where an actual table isn't appropriate (like an image gallery). If I instead do something like this: <ul> <ligroup> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> </ligroup> <ligroup> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> </ligroup> <ligroup> <li></li> <li></li> </ligroup> </ul> I'm using the grouping element merely for presentational purposes—as in dividing a row of each one and keeping three columns, so a CSS workaround is desirable.
Received on Friday, 16 July 2010 02:04:15 UTC