- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:00:34 -0700
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 09/27/2009 01:24 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > Consider the following testcase: > > <!DOCTYPE html> > <body> > <div style="height: 200px;"> > Text > <div style="float: left; height: 50%; width: 100px; > background: green"></div> > More text > <div>x</div> > Text > <div style="float: left; height: 50%; width: 100px; > background: orange"></div> > More text > </div> > </body> > > In current browsers I see the following behavior: > > Gecko: Two floating 100px by 100px squares (one green, one orange). > Opera 10: As Gecko. > IE8: As Gecko. > > Webkit: No visible squares; the offsetHeight of the floating divs is > reported as 0. > > If the "<div>x</div>" is removed, then Webkit's rendering changes to > match the other browsers. > > I believe the issue is a disagreement over section 10.1 item 2. Webkit > is using the anonymous block box created per section 9.2.1.1 to contain > the text as the containing block for the float. If one assumes that the > float and the text around it have the same ancestor boxes (which seems > like an eminently reasonable assumption), then this interpretation makes > sense. If this item is not actually talking about boxes but rather means > "the box generated by the nearest block-level ancestor element", then > it's just ambiguous as to which box is meant here. Proposed wording: Add to section 9.2.1.1 <http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#anonymous-block-level>: | Anonymous block boxes are ignored when resolving percentage values | that would refer to it: the closest non-anonymous ancestor box is | used instead. For example, if the child of the anonymous block box | inside the DIV above needs to know the height of its containing block | to resolve a percentage height, then it will use the height of the | containing block formed by the DIV, not of the anonymous block box. Because that's the best I can come up with here. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2010 21:01:14 UTC