- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:23:03 +0200
- To: "Simon Fraser" <smfr@me.com>
- Cc: "Luiz Agostini" <luiz.agostini@openbossa.org>, "Kenneth Christiansen" <kenneth.christiansen@openbossa.org>, www-style@w3.org, marcosc@opera.com
On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 19:34:00 +0200, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: > On Jul 5, 2010, at 1:09 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> I have been thinking about this some more and I am no longer convinced >> the complexity is justified. I think using closures is fine. For other >> languages the bindings can be slightly modified to return a token >> instead or something. But there's no need to make the ECMAScript >> variant more complex as well, especially since not all implementations >> will have various languages implementing these bindings, and also since >> the dominant use of this API will be in ECMAScript. > > I'm not keen on having to special-case generated code, and, in WebKit, > we compile Objective-C bindings for many of the IDL interfaces, and see > people use them fairly extensively in applications that embed WebKit. > > Can you re-state your proposal so we're all on the same page? My proposal is that we do the renaming but otherwise keep the specification as-is: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/cssom-view/#the-stylemedia-interface Making it more complex just to suit the non-ECMAScript case does not seem worth it. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2010 09:24:02 UTC