- From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 10:34:00 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: Luiz Agostini <luiz.agostini@openbossa.org>, Kenneth Christiansen <kenneth.christiansen@openbossa.org>, www-style@w3.org, marcosc@opera.com
On Jul 5, 2010, at 1:09 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > I have been thinking about this some more and I am no longer convinced the complexity is justified. I think using closures is fine. For other languages the bindings can be slightly modified to return a token instead or something. But there's no need to make the ECMAScript variant more complex as well, especially since not all implementations will have various languages implementing these bindings, and also since the dominant use of this API will be in ECMAScript. I'm not keen on having to special-case generated code, and, in WebKit, we compile Objective-C bindings for many of the IDL interfaces, and see people use them fairly extensively in applications that embed WebKit. Can you re-state your proposal so we're all on the same page? Simon
Received on Friday, 9 July 2010 17:35:05 UTC