- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:47:24 +0100
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:38:27 +0100, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > On Sunday 2010-01-31 22:33 +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> (Indeed, Gecko implements enableStyleSheetsForSet(). I think this >> was due to me complaining about the original specification at the >> time, which was using stylesheet/Stylesheet all over (inconsistently >> so with document.styleSheets): >> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/2005-09-01/#alternate but I >> cannot find a reference.) > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200930#c98 (comments 98 > through 100) suggest that the case had been fixed in the Web Apps > 1.0 spec on 2006-06-27, although the reason Gecko implements the > right case is because we noticed the inconsistency in the code and > *then* noticed that the spec had been fixed under us. Ah, right. > Was what's in the current CSSOM draft forked from the WHATWG spec > before the material was removed from the WHATWG spec? If so, are > there any other useful edits that were missed? It was forked yes, but as far as I can tell no other edits were missed. However, the current version in CSSOM is done in a different style to allow easier integration of various other features it defines. When rewriting things errors may have been introduced (such as one of the typos). -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Sunday, 31 January 2010 23:48:04 UTC