- From: Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:10:26 -0800
- To: news@terrainformatica.com
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com> wrote: > There are actually not too many alternatives. > > The most viable solution is to a) use conic gradient How are you drawing the conic gradients? I've not been able to find them as an accelerated primitive on any common OS. > Using method (B): > http://www.terrainformatica.com/w3/round-corners-sciter-b.png > > And for the record the same but using method (A) on the figure above: > http://www.terrainformatica.com/w3/round-corners-sciter.png > > Note case #10. (B) variant I think is least controversial. I don't think either of the options you have presented is the correct rendering for case #10. I think that when the inner edge has a sharp corner, the point of the cone should always be at the corner, even when that's not a corner of the outer bounding box of the transition area. And I think the gradient should probably be limited to the dark green region in "case D" here: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/transition-region.png but I might be persuaded that it should extend to the limits of the light green region with the point of the cone remaining at the inner corner (i.e. equivalent to your current case 10 rendering but with the point of the cone moved). Is it practical for you to redraw your "case 10" under both of those rules and post the result? zw
Received on Tuesday, 26 January 2010 18:11:02 UTC