- From: Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 22:59:45 -0800
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Cc: W3C Emailing list for WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: > On Jan 15, 2010, at 18:39 , Zack Weinberg wrote: > > David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: > > > >> So, are we leaning towards something like the following? > > [...] > > > > Chiming in with something I haven't seen mentioned at all in the > > thread, perhaps because everyone assumes it's obvious: it's very > > important IMO that regardless of the relationship between CSS px and > > device pixels, bitmap images are drawn at a scale of 1 CSS px per > > image pixel. > > No, that really doesn't work. As devices go to higher and higher > pixel densities, it's really *undesirsable* that images get smaller > and smaller. Sure, but I thought the consensus was leaning toward 1 CSS px not being a device pixel on those devices, either. It kinda sounds like you (and Brad) understood me to say the exact opposite of what I meant. I was trying to say that if a CSS px was bigger than a device pixel, then bitmap image pixels should *also* be bigger than a device pixel, by the same ratio. zw
Received on Saturday, 16 January 2010 07:00:20 UTC