- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 08:29:30 -0600
- To: Simetrical <simetrical@gmail.com>
- Cc: Ambrose LI <ambrose.li@gmail.com>, www-style List <www-style@w3.org>
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Simetrical <simetrical@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Ambrose LI <ambrose.li@gmail.com> wrote: >> I have this crazy idea that this is still an "education" problem. > > I don't think you're ever going to educate all web authors that "12pt" > is unsuitable for the web when it works just fine in Word. I strongly > suspect that most people who use point sizes don't even know that a > point is 1/72 of an inch, and have just developed an intuitive > understanding of what various point sizes mean based on their > experience with word processors. The problem from this perspective is > that most people probably think of "pt" in relative terms, not as a > physical unit. (The other problem is that physical units are of > limited utility in web pages.) That was precisely my experience, for example - I just through of pt as "the weird unit that Word uses for font sizes". I used it once or twice before discarding it as too annoying. I definitely thought of it in the same terms as px, though. ~TJ
Received on Sunday, 10 January 2010 14:29:57 UTC