- From: Thomas Phinney <tphinney@cal.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 15:33:43 -0800
- To: robert@ocallahan.org
- Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <f49ae6ac1001051533m3ac62ba5kbc495df0e3acc8c5@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote: > >> My understanding from a conversation I had on #webkit is that Webkit >> avoids the problem by treating 1pt as 4/3px regardless of the display DPI. I >> think we probably need to do this in Gecko for Web compatibility reasons, >> and so for the sake of honesty in Web specifications, I propose that the >> definition of pt in CSS be altered accordingly. >> >> (At this time, I don't think we need to give up on physical units >> entirely; all the problematic sites I'm aware of are misusing pt, but not mm >> or in. mm remains useful for specifying the dimensions of touch-based >> interfaces.) >> > > One additional question is what to do with picas. I propose keeping picas > at 12 points, i.e., fixing them at 16 CSS pixels, i.e., making them no > longer be a physical unit. I'm not aware of any Web content using picas at > all, so we could leave them as physical units, but that might be > unnecessarily confusing. > it's definitely worth keeping the pica/pt relationship if possible. T
Received on Tuesday, 5 January 2010 23:34:16 UTC