- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 11:45:15 -0800
- To: robert@ocallahan.org
- CC: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>, Melinda Grant <Melinda.Grant@gmx.com>
Robert O'Callahan wrote: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com > <mailto:alexmog@microsoft.com>> wrote: > > Robert O'Callahan wrote in <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jan/0058.html> > > > My understanding from a conversation I had on #webkit is that Webkit > > > avoids the problem by treating 1pt as 4/3px regardless of the display > > > DPI. I think we probably need to do this in Gecko for Web compatibility > > > reasons, and so for the sake of honesty in Web specifications, I > > > propose that the definition of pt in CSS be altered accordingly > > > > For the record, IE treats “pt” the way you propose for a number of > > versions already. > > Thanks for the info! Then we should definitely change the spec. What about locking things the other way, 1px == 3/4pt? That seems less drastic, because at least you're keeping the 1pt = 1/72in. I'm wondering how this will play out for other media, like print. > > At this time there is no physical units in IE (that is there is no > > unit that doesn’t grow or shrink with zoom) . > > In Gecko, physical lengths still change with zoom. So if you zoom in by > 2x, a 1in length will be exactly 2 inches (if the OS didn't lie to us > about the screen characteristics). This is as it should be. Zoom should zoom all lengths equally. It's zoom level 0 that we need to sort out here. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 5 January 2010 19:45:58 UTC