- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
- Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 08:32:58 -0500
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>
- CC: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Brady Duga <duga@ljug.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
It looks like it's not easy to reach consensus even for native English speakers. Should we move on to numbers as David Singer suggested? 20: newspaper 50: normal 80: strict I can live without names if that makes everyone happy. Regards, Koji -----Original Message----- From: fantasai [mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net] Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 1:01 PM To: John Hudson Cc: Koji Ishii; David Singer; Brady Duga; www-style@w3.org Subject: Re: [css3-text] alternate name for line-break: newspaper On 12/21/2010 09:52 PM, John Hudson wrote: > fantasai wrote: >> If we need to add a third level, we can call it "lenient" or "relaxed" >> line-break: normal | strict | loose | relaxed > > I would switch those around (with the final three in order from strictest to least strict): > > line-break: normal | strict | relaxed | loose > > It's like shopping for jeans: relaxed fit comes before loose fit. Um, yeah, that's what I meant. :) > Since the idea of the least strict style is a minimal set of restrictions, how about > > line-break: normal | strict | relaxed | basic The problem is that "basic" then becomes confusable with "normal". ~fantasai
Received on Sunday, 26 December 2010 13:36:25 UTC