- From: Ambrose LI <ambrose.li@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 08:32:50 -0500
- To: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
- Cc: "Belov, Charles" <Charles.Belov@sfmta.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
2010/12/26 Ambrose LI <ambrose.li@gmail.com>: >> From what I understand, what Charles wants is to fix underlines for superscript and subscript. I agree that what current browsers do today seems odd, but I'm not sure if we need more values to text-underline-position. > > What Charles proposed are ways to specify how the constant underline > position in #1 should be determined. Perhaps there can be ways to get > rid of the proposed keywords, but his proposal is a good analysis > (without considering the requirements for the Chinese typography) of > what we will need to deal with when we need the browser to figure out > a constant position for the underlining. I've hit the Send button too soon. Actually what Charles proposed also includes keywords to indicate what to do when we want super/subscripts to move (i.e., when we explicitly don't want to keep a constant underline position). That is, the keywords address both #1 and #2 for the non-Chinese cases. -- cheers, -ambrose does anyone know how to fix Snow Leopard? it broke input method switching and is causing many typing mistakes and is very annoying
Received on Sunday, 26 December 2010 13:33:19 UTC