- From: Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 18:31:50 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
Hello, as far as I understand this, after the changes, the sections about the reference pixel are misleading. It is defined now: " in: inches — 1in is equal to 2.54cm. cm: centimeters mm: millimeters pt: points — the points used by CSS are equal to 1/72nd of 1in. pc: picas — 1pc is equal to 12pt. px: pixel units — 1px is equal to 0.75pt. " And because the size of a mm or cm is precisely known by measurements of a second and the defintion of the speed of light, a px results in (127/480) mm. A standard unit like a second (and therefore derived units like meter, mm, cm etc) are of high cultural and scientific importance and it is as well important for techniques and trade to be able to rely on the assumption, that all people follow the same definition of such international standard units (to avoid catastrophes and cheating). Therefore there cannot be another definition for international standard units. (It is of course possible to propose a high precision method and measurement of 1s to improve the current definition, but this does not happen here obviously). Therefore the section about the reference pixel and the image about it is misleading now or in contradiction with the new definition above, because there can be only one definition of a px. I propose to remove this part about the reference pixel therefore. Olaf
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2010 17:32:31 UTC