- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 01:52:41 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@adobe.com>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, "Leif Arne Storset" <lstorset@opera.com>, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, "www-style list" <www-style@w3.org>
> From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 5:39 PM > To: Sylvain Galineau > Cc: Rik Cabanier; Simon Fraser; Leif Arne Storset; Brad Kemper; www- > style list > Subject: Re: background-transform (Was: Re: [css3-images] Repeating > oblique gradients) > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Sylvain Galineau > <sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote: > > I don't mind proposing a syntax but as it seems obvious - to me > > at least - I assume it has been considered before. I'm mostly > > curious as to why we're not considering this. Or why not now ? > > I haven't seen sufficient argument as of yet for including it. I can > be convinced, of course, with some assurance that it would be > implemented. Can you link to the relevant proposal and the feedback ? Duplicating properties of interest for images across background, border images and every other feature that accepts an image URL seems to be the kind of redundancy a module named 'Image Values' would be written to address.
Received on Monday, 6 December 2010 01:53:24 UTC