W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2010

RE: background-transform (Was: Re: [css3-images] Repeating oblique gradients)

From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 01:52:41 +0000
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@adobe.com>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, "Leif Arne Storset" <lstorset@opera.com>, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, "www-style list" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <045A765940533D4CA4933A4A7E32597E2A5B25A8@TK5EX14MBXC111.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
> From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 5:39 PM
> To: Sylvain Galineau
> Cc: Rik Cabanier; Simon Fraser; Leif Arne Storset; Brad Kemper; www-
> style list
> Subject: Re: background-transform (Was: Re: [css3-images] Repeating
> oblique gradients)
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Sylvain Galineau
> <sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote:
> > I don't mind proposing a syntax but as it seems obvious - to me
> > at least - I assume it has been considered before. I'm mostly
> > curious as to why we're not considering this. Or why not now ?
> I haven't seen sufficient argument as of yet for including it.  I can
> be convinced, of course, with some assurance that it would be
> implemented.

Can you link to the relevant proposal and the feedback ?

Duplicating properties of interest for images across background, 
border images and every other feature that accepts an image URL 
seems to be the kind of redundancy a module named 'Image Values' 
would be written to address. 

Received on Monday, 6 December 2010 01:53:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:53 UTC