Re: background-transform (Was: Re: [css3-images] Repeating oblique gradients) from Tab Atkins Jr. on 2010-12-06 (www-style@w3.org from December 2010)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 17:39:20 -0800
To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@adobe.com>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com>, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimx1UpO_hFaH+QhiwKd-pw7kq3Xe=2xPkMQEOXm@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote:
> I don't mind proposing a syntax but as it seems obvious - to me
> at least - I assume it has been considered before. I'm mostly
> curious as to why we're not considering this. Or why not now ?

I haven't seen sufficient argument as of yet for including it.  I can
be convinced, of course, with some assurance that it would be
implemented.

~TJ

Received on Monday, 6 December 2010 01:40:15 UTC