Re: background-transform (Was: Re: [css3-images] Repeating oblique gradients)

On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Sylvain Galineau <> wrote:
> I don't mind proposing a syntax but as it seems obvious - to me
> at least - I assume it has been considered before. I'm mostly
> curious as to why we're not considering this. Or why not now ?

I haven't seen sufficient argument as of yet for including it.  I can
be convinced, of course, with some assurance that it would be


Received on Monday, 6 December 2010 01:40:15 UTC