- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:32:03 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- CC: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@adobe.com>, Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com>, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
> From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Tab Atkins Jr. > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 10:02 AM > I kinda like background-transform too. I like the capability, I'm not sure I like having to add another set of properties just for backgrounds vs. allowing the definition of a named image with all relevant transforms and other properties, definition that could then be referenced anywhere. I can do this to some extent in SVG using svgView e.g. I can do http://site.com/image.svg#svgView(transform(rotate(10deg)) and use that anywhere an image URL is accepted but I'd be more comfortable binding the image and the rotation together in CSS and use the result anywhere an image() value is accepted.
Received on Saturday, 4 December 2010 20:32:39 UTC