Done (as issues for now). Btw, why did you change the title of the document to CSS3 Ruby Annotation Module? I think this is not a good idea. The Ruby Annotation spec is about annotation, and it helps people keep the two specs separate in their minds to have the word annotation in only one. RI ============ Richard Ishida Internationalization Lead W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) http://www.w3.org/International/ http://rishida.net/ > -----Original Message----- > From: fantasai [mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net] > Sent: 02 December 2010 21:06 > To: Richard Ishida > Cc: www-style@w3.org > Subject: Re: [css-ruby] Proposal to publish new WD > Importance: High > > On 12/01/2010 12:30 PM, Richard Ishida wrote: > > Folks, > > > > I'd like to publish the version of the CSS3 Ruby Module at > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-ruby/ > > as a new WD. This will take the ruby module out of CR and revert it to a > Working Draft. > > Other issues: > > 1. I think you should mark as an issue that the spec needs to address > anonymous box generation rules (and to make them compatible with HTML5 > ruby markup). > > 2. The line-breaking section should say that line breaks are only > allowed within ruby if the ruby base text can be broken at that > point. E.g. if complex Ruby is used to annotate the two morphemes > of "butterfly", the fact that we have added ruby annotations should > not cause a line breaking opportunity to be present between "butter" > and "fly". > > ~fantasaiReceived on Friday, 3 December 2010 10:17:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:13:53 UTC