- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:35:55 -0700
- To: www-style@gtalbot.org
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 08/18/2010 12:32 PM, "Gérard Talbot" wrote: > > Le Mer 18 août 2010 1:11, fantasai a écrit : >> This is for CSS2.1 Issue 159 >> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-159 >> triggered by this email >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0015.html >> >> This is version 2. > >> | * If the top and bottom margins of an element with clearance are >> | adjoining, its margins collapse with the adjoining margins of >> | subsequent siblings but that resulting margin does not collapse >> | with the bottom margin of the parent block. > > > s/subsequent/following/ > > see > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0183.html > > [snipped] Fixed. Thanks for catching that. >> | * The bottom margin of an in-flow block element with a >> | 'height' of 'auto' collapses with its last in-flow block-level >> | child's bottom margin if the element has no bottom padding or >> | border. > > > I'm risking this suggestion here: > > s/no bottom padding or border/no bottom padding and no bottom border/ > > just to eliminate a potential source of confusion, just to eliminate an > hesitation in the mind. Ok. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 19 August 2010 18:36:32 UTC