- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 13:42:07 -0700
- To: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 07/25/2010 05:21 AM, Anton Prowse wrote: > Issue 1. > > 9.2.1 (Block-level elements and block boxes) says:[1] > > # Some block-level elements generate additional boxes outside of the > # principal box: 'list-item' elements. These additional boxes are > # placed with respect to the principal box. > > s/generate/may generate/ assuming that the additional box in question is > the marker box, which may or may not exist, and may or may not be > outside the principal block box. Good catch. This paragraph should also have s/outside of/in addition to/. > Issue 2. > > 9.2.4 (The 'display' property)[2] says of the 'list-item' value: > > # This value causes an element (e.g., LI in HTML) to generate a > # principal block box and a list-item inline box. > > 12.5 (Lists) says:[3] > > # An element with 'display: list-item' generates a principal box for > # the element's content and an optional marker box as a visual > # indication that the element is a list item. > > 12.5 doesn't actually say how the element's content flows (eg box > generation), so one assumes it participates in an inline formatting > context within the list-item's principal block box. This is supported > by the description of the 'inside' value of the list-style-position > property: > > # The marker box is the first inline box in the principal block box, > # after which the element's content flows. > > But then, what is the "list-item inline box" of which 9.2.4 talks? This > should probably be reworded. > > Also, why doesn't that sentence in 9.2.4 mention the marker box? OK, > the sentence is followed by "consult the section on lists", but it would > hardly hurt to mention the marker box at that point, and would be more > coherent and useful. Right. We need s/inline box/marker box/ in 9.2.4. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 4 August 2010 20:42:43 UTC