On 4/28/10 2:30 PM, Brad Kemper wrote: > I see. So, if we had a new length unit, call it '%-of-auto' for now, > then I could get what I'm looking for. I could then transition between > 'height: 0%-of-auto' and 'height: 100%-of-auto'. Then everything > continues to deal with computed values instead of used values, which > seems to be the most salient issue here. Well, that just pushes the problems off into defining what the used value of %-of-auto is, right? I'm still not convinced this would give sane author-facing behavior, but given a clear definition of %-of-auto it would at least be well-defined on the implementation side... -BorisReceived on Wednesday, 28 April 2010 18:46:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:45 UTC