- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 11:30:22 -0700
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Cc: Perry Smith <pedzsan@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Apr 28, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU> wrote: > 2) Had you used 0% instead of 0, Picky, picky. ;) Yeah, I shoulda. I assumed that all zeros being equal, that either would have worked equivalently. But that is probably the start of another thread. > the width of the parentNode doesn't affect the computed value, and > transitions happen on computed values. So in this case there is one > transition, running from 0% to 50%. Whenever the width change > happens the then-current transitioning percentage is used to > determine the new _used_ value, but the computed value is not > affected so the transition just keeps on going. I see. So, if we had a new length unit, call it '%-of-auto' for now, then I could get what I'm looking for. I could then transition between 'height: 0%-of-auto' and 'height: 100%-of-auto'. Then everything continues to deal with computed values instead of used values, which seems to be the most salient issue here.
Received on Wednesday, 28 April 2010 18:31:09 UTC