- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:11:20 -0700
- To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Cc: HÃ¥kon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
On Apr 9, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: > Changing opacity from 1 to something less than 1 can have very > obvious side effects: because opacity creates stacking context, > itcan change the layering of elements on the page. Oh yeah. Black to rgba(0,0,0,0.999) then. > >> But that seemed more likely to illicit charges of being too- >> hackish, which I will probably now receive anyway. > > It's hackish :) > > I think we need to avoid a proposal that forces authors to fake a > transition in order to get an animation effect. It's really more of a proof that inserting an animation into a transition, to trigger when the transition does, is a powerful way to solve the main use cases, and can also help with other (possibly edge-) cases in a pinch. I like that much of it more than I like trying to twist 'animation' into double duty to fulfil the purposes of transitions, and I like it better than adding start-, during-, and after- into animations. I realize it isn't all that elegant in it's present form in terms of those cases where I got hackish, but I thought it was a start that might be further improved along the direction it's going.
Received on Friday, 9 April 2010 20:12:07 UTC