On Apr 7, 2010, at 7:59 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> And I don't like that the "transition" name (which is hard to spell) >> is still in there. May I suggest that you rename "transition" to >> "effect" (or something) in your proposal? >> >> Håkon's naming priciple: Good names are better than correct names. > > I have no particular attachment to the current name. I think "transition" is the most descriptive and evocative, of anything I've heard so far for this. It is meaningful. I much prefer it to "effect", which could mean almost anything. A glow can be an effect. So can an echo.
Received on Thursday, 8 April 2010 17:50:52 UTC