- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 23:08:01 +0200
- To: Chris Marrin <cmarrin@apple.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
I wrote:
> > > @animation bounce {
> > > from { top: 0; }
> > > 33% { top: -20px; }
> > > 66% { top: 20px; }
> > > to { top: 0; }
> > > }
> > You're trying to come up with a single syntax that encompasses the
> > functionality of transitions and animations. But in doing so you
> > are introducing a confusing mix of specifying property values in
> > two places: in the style rule, and in the @animation rule.
>
> I'm confused. The @animation thing is in the current specifications,
To clarify slightly: it's called @keyframes in the current propopsal.
But same thing, same syntax.
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-animations/
Cheers,
-h&kon
Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Monday, 5 April 2010 21:08:44 UTC