- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 08:39:14 -0700
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Alberto Lepe <dev@alepe.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 4, 2010, at 10:39 PM, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: >> On Monday 2010-04-05 10:47 +0900, Alberto Lepe wrote: >>> >>> Is there any other objection? >>> Who else is supporting this addition? >> >> To be clear: adding a feature requires that we do another last >> call, in which anybody can send comments (on any part of the spec, >> not just the changes), and then reaching working group consensus on >> the correct response to all the last call comments received, >> allowing the commenters the chance to object, etc. That's a good >> bit of work -- and work that I probably wouldn't a consider a >> priority over other things I could be doing -- I think volunteering >> to edit css3-color was probably a mistake. >> >> I'd sort of like to take a subset of the featureset that was in CR >> in 2003 to Recommendation; this working group hasn't had a very good >> record lately of advancing documents to Recommendation, and we're >> pretty close on this one. >> >> I have no objection to implementing this, though. (I'd sort of like >> to hear an opinion from Molly or somebody else involved in teaching >> CSS to newcomers, though.) >> >> If the working group agrees, are you volunteering to join the >> working group and do the administrative work described above to push >> this spec through another last call with this addition? >> >> -David > > Maybe it would be faster to have it as the only thing in a CSS4 color > module? Indeed. I'm happy to take CSS3 Color to Rec as-is, but would definitely like #rrggbbaa in Color 4. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 5 April 2010 15:40:06 UTC