- From: Biju <bijumaillist@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:16:31 -0430
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:39 AM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > I have no objection to implementing this, though. (I'd sort of like > to hear an opinion from Molly or somebody else involved in teaching > CSS to newcomers, though.) In my experience teaching #C0C0C0 to a new comer is easy, they see it as a Label or a code. And for those who are interested, you can explain how to compute it. But for the case of rgb(), first of all it looks like a function and everybody will see it as complex scientific function so you start explaining the mathematics behind it and at end most newcomers will get completely lost. How can a base 256 parameter for rgb() ever become easier to teach than a hexadecimal?
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2010 00:47:11 UTC