- From: Glen <glen.84@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 21:16:41 +0200
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- CC: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>, www-style@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4BB79419.3000602@gmail.com>
On 2010/04/03 20:46, Brad Kemper wrote: > I think as long as it was outside of the rule block and before the > line feed character, it would just get thrown away, and the practical > effect would often be the same as a comment. But if the white space > (including line feeds) was ever collapsed into a single space (as some > existing editors or optimizers might do), then it would interfere with > the next selector. > > Anyway, the WG discussed the proposal on 2010-03-24, and it is in the > minutes. The issue was closed. I didn't know it was discussed in the meeting, no one even replied to my initial message to the list. RESOLVED with a question mark after a short discussion -- interesting. The biggest point against it seems to be compatibility with older browsers, which I addressed in my previous message. > On Apr 3, 2010, at 10:59 AM, François REMY wrote: > >> No theorical objection. They are practical objections though. How >> will it work >> when you use // comments with 'old' browsers ? It will not work. So >> you can't >> use it in a safe way. >> >> *From:* Glen <mailto:glen.84@gmail.com> >> *Sent:* Saturday, April 03, 2010 7:26 PM >> *To:* www-style@w3.org <mailto:www-style@w3.org> >> *Subject:* Re: Single-line comments >> >> No replies? Does that mean no objections? :-) >> >> On 2010/03/19 21:08, Glen wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Has there ever been any discussion regarding the addition of >>> single-line comments? //color: red; >>> >>> It's a lot faster to type when you just want to toggle a single >>> declaration. It's also obviously useful for permanent comments where >>> multiple lines are not required. >>> >>> Glen. >
Received on Saturday, 3 April 2010 19:17:29 UTC