W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2009

Re: Border-Images and 'round': CSS Backgrounds and Borders Module Level 3

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:03:30 -0700
Message-ID: <4AC3AB82.7010300@inkedblade.net>
To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Brad Kemper wrote:
> Because partial tiles look pretty bad, right? If each side is tiled 
> first, with the number of whole tiles (or single stretched tile) that 
> will fit in the space, and then positioned in the space, then there is 
> not this problem for "repeat" either. Here is how I would do it:

I'm fine with adding a 'space' option for border-image to match

I'm /not/ comfortable changing 'repeat' so that it behaves differently
in border-image than it does for backgrounds. Yes, it's use is somewhat
limited to images that have a sharp linear division between the corner
and the sides, but I think the usefulness of changing that to add a gap
is questionable and not worth the inconsistency with background-repeat.

Received on Wednesday, 30 September 2009 19:04:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:39 UTC