- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:03:30 -0700
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Brad Kemper wrote: > > Because partial tiles look pretty bad, right? If each side is tiled > first, with the number of whole tiles (or single stretched tile) that > will fit in the space, and then positioned in the space, then there is > not this problem for "repeat" either. Here is how I would do it: I'm fine with adding a 'space' option for border-image to match 'background-repeat'. I'm /not/ comfortable changing 'repeat' so that it behaves differently in border-image than it does for backgrounds. Yes, it's use is somewhat limited to images that have a sharp linear division between the corner and the sides, but I think the usefulness of changing that to add a gap is questionable and not worth the inconsistency with background-repeat. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 30 September 2009 19:04:10 UTC