- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:14:43 +0200
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org
fantasai scribed:
> image-fit and image-position
> ----------------------------
>
> RESOLVED (TENTATIVE): Merge image-fit and image-position into single
> 'fit' property
> RATIONALE: 'image-fit' and 'image-position' are not appropriate names for
> what SVG wants to use them for, and nobody had a better proposal.
I don't think this is a good solution, the resulting property will be
very complex considering all the values on 'image-fit' and
'image-position':
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-page/#propdef-image-posn
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-page/#propdef-image-fit
I suggest that we either (1) stick to the current "image" names but
specify that this can apply to <video> as well, or that we (2) rename
these to 'content-fit' and 'content-position'.
My preference would be (2).
Here are some relevant posts on the topic.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Mar/0203.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Mar/0134.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2009Apr/0105.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Jun/0184.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Jun/0342.html
-h&kon
Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2009 15:15:40 UTC