- From: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
- Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:02:09 +0200
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
- CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Anton Prowse wrote: > fantasai wrote: >> Anton Prowse wrote: >>> 7.2. The ::first-letter pseudo-element >>> (http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-selectors-20090310/#first-letter) : >>> >> >> I've rearranged that section to split out the CSS-specific discussion: >> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors3/#first-letter > > I very much like the new ordering, thanks! Just one trivial point: > > # If the letters that would form the ::first-letter are not in the > # same element, such as "'T" in <p>'<em>T..., the UA may create a > # ::first-letter pseudo-element from one of the elements, both > # elements, or simply not create a pseudo-element. > # > # [...] > # > # In CSS the first letter of a table-cell or inline-block cannot be > # the first letter of an ancestor element. Thus, in <DIV><P > # STYLE="display: inline-block">Hello<BR>Goodbye</P> etcetera</DIV> > # the first letter of the DIV is not the letter "H". In fact, the DIV > # doesn't have a first letter. > > In each of these sentences, can we insert "the HTML fragment" before the > fragment? > Scratch that; In the light of the recent change to the Terminology section, this is no longer necessary. Cheers, Anton Prowse http://dev.moonhenge.net
Received on Saturday, 24 October 2009 11:04:26 UTC