- From: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
- Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 10:37:37 +0200
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
- CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
fantasai wrote: > Anton Prowse wrote: >> 6.6.5. Structural pseudo-classes >> (http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-selectors-20090310/#structural-pseudos) >> : >> >> # Standalone pieces of PCDATA (text nodes in the DOM) and other >> # non-element nodes are not counted when calculating the position of >> # an element in the list of children of its parent. >> >> Issue 4: Neither "PCDATA" nor "DOM" are defined in this document. >> "PCDATA" is not used anywhere else in the document, and "DOM" is only >> used once more in normative text, in the subsection ':empty >> pseudo-class' of this section. >> >> ... >> >> 6.6.5 :empty pseudo-class >> (http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-selectors-20090310/#empty-pseudo) : >> >> # The :empty pseudo-class represents an element that has no children >> # at all. In terms of the DOM, only element nodes and text nodes >> # (including CDATA nodes and entity references) whose data has a >> # non-zero length must be considered as affecting emptiness; comments, >> # PIs, and other nodes must not affect whether an element is >> # considered empty or not. >> >> Issue 6: Neither "DOM", "CDATA" nor "PI" are defined in this document. >> Neither "CDATA" nor "PI" is used anywhere else in the document, and >> "DOM" is only used once more in normative text, in the introduction to >> this section. > > I've attempted to handle these by altering the wording and adding an > informative reference to DOM3 Core: > > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/csswg/selectors3/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.60&r2=1.61&f=h > > > Please let me know if this addresses your comment. It does, thanks! Cheers, Anton Prowse http://dev.moonhenge.net
Received on Saturday, 24 October 2009 08:39:53 UTC